Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Scott v. State

Scott v. State

112 So. 3d 114, 2013 WL 1348427, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5595
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12540 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 2013·No. No. 5D12-844·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Ward v. State, 21 So.3d 896, 899-900 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (“[T]he issue is whether the officers had reasonable' suspicion to believe that [the defendant] had committed the offense of trespassing, not whether the defendant had actually committed a crime. A police officer is not required to determine conclusively that a crime has occurred prior to detaining an individual.”)

LAWSON, EVANDER, and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 112 So. 3d 114, 2013 WL 1348427, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5595 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

112 So. 3d 114 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. State
21 So. 3d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)