Scott v. State

767 So. 2d 559, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10996, 2000 WL 1224701
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 721 So. 2d 1245
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 30, 2000·No. No. 1D00-2243·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The disposition of a rule 3.800(c) motion is within the trial court’s discretion and is unappealable. See Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

WOLF, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 767 So. 2d 559, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10996, 2000 WL 1224701 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

767 So. 2d 559 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
568 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)