Scott v. State

658 So. 2d 1250, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8889, 1995 WL 497302
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 629 So. 2d 238
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 1995·No. No. 94-1019·Published

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

We reverse the taxation of costs of prosecution for lack of documentation by the state and the failure to consider the financial resources of the defendant. See Gant v. State, 640 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Pickrel v. State, 609 So.2d 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); and Richter v. State, 597 So.2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Upon the state’s concession, we also strike from the order of probation the condition that defendant submit to random breathalyzer or blood tests. See Allen v. State, 640 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

REVERSED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and POLEN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 658 So. 2d 1250, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8889, 1995 WL 497302 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

658 So. 2d 1250 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richter v. State
597 So. 2d 413 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Gant v. State
640 So. 2d 1180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Allen v. State
640 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Pickrel v. State
609 So. 2d 65 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)