Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scott v. State

253 So. 2d 454

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 1971

DocketNo. 71-407

StatusPublished

This text of 253 So. 2d 454 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. State, 253 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the briefs and record-on-appeal in this case, oral argument having been waived. We find no reversible error.

In particular, we do not find the out-of-court photographic identification of defendant by the victim to be violative of the due process standards set forth in Simmons v. United States, 1968, 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247. See also Jenkins v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 114.

The decision appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the briefs and record-on-appeal in this case, oral argument having been waived. We find no reversible error.

In particular, we do not find the out-of-court photographic identification of defendant by the victim to be violative of the due process standards set forth in Simmons v. United States, 1968, 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247. See also Jenkins v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 114.

The decision appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 So. 2d 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack