Scott v. State

759 So. 2d 683, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 428, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1050, 2000 WL 674594
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 25, 2000·No. No. SC95615·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Scott v. State, 729 So.2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), which is a per curiam decision citing to Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), quashed, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). However, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted; thus, the case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 759 So. 2d 683, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 428, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1050, 2000 WL 674594 (Fla. 2000).

759 So. 2d 683 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Levan v. State
759 So. 2d 683 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)