Scott v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Scott v. State

759 So. 2d 683, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 428, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1050, 2000 WL 674594

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 25, 2000

DocketNo. SC95615

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 759 So. 2d 683 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. State, 759 So. 2d 683, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 428, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1050, 2000 WL 674594 (Fla. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Scott v. State, 729 So.2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), which is a per curiam decision citing to Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), quashed, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). However, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted; thus, the case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Scott v. State, 729 So.2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), which is a per curiam decision citing to Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), quashed, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). However, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted; thus, the case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

759 So. 2d 683, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 428, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1050, 2000 WL 674594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-fla-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack