Scott v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Scott v. State

847 S.W.2d 717, 312 Ark. 400, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 185

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 22, 1993·No. CR 93-232·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Trayvon Lavell Scott, by his attorney has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, William M. Howard, Jr., admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Trayvon Lavell Scott, by his attorney has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, William M. Howard, Jr., admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Scott v. State, 847 S.W.2d 717, 312 Ark. 400, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 185 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

847 S.W.2d 717 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.