Scott v. Stansbury

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6282

HENRY MCKINLEY SCOTT,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA STANSBURY,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:10-cv-00061-HCM-FBS)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry McKinley Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Henry McKinley Scott, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Stansbury, No.

2:10-cv-00061-HCM-FBS (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 3, 2011 & entered

Feb. 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED