Scott v. Standart

19 Wend. 642
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1839
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Wend. 642 (Scott v. Standart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Standart, 19 Wend. 642 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1839).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

This was not the case of a joint contract, and the plaintiffs could proceed only against the party who had been brought into court. If they could not declare against him alone, they had no alternative but to abandon a suit which had been properly commenced. We have already gone very far in allowing a severance, where the plaintiff proceeds under the statute authorizing the holder to include all the different parties to a note or bill in one ac[643]*643tion. Fuller v. Van Schaick, 18 Wendell, 547. Clark v. Parker, 19 id. 125. I think a severance of the action should be allowed in this case. It forms a necessary~xception to the general rule, that in bailable actions the declaration must follow the process.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Wend. 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-standart-nysupct-1839.