Scott v. Spearman
This text of 1997 Ohio 148 (Scott v. Spearman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 1215.]
SCOTT ET AL., APPELLANTS, V. SPEARMAN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Scott v. Spearman, 1997-Ohio-148.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 96-963—Submitted June 11, 1997—Decided July 30, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Licking County, No. 95 CA 55. ___________________ Bricker & Eckler, Drew H. Campbell and Michael D. Smith, for appellants. William C. Hayes and W. Scott Hayes, for appellee. ___________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. ___________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 Ohio 148, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-spearman-ohio-1997.