Scott v. South Carolina

343 F. App'x 864
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 14, 2009·No. No. 09-6598·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wanda Scott appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for waiver of PACER fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. South Carolina, No. 6:08-cv-01684-GRA, 2009 WL 750419 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [865]*865presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. South Carolina, 343 F. App'x 864 (4th Cir. 2009).

343 F. App'x 864 (Scott v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.