Scott v. South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Scott v. South Carolina

11 F. App'x 165

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2001·No. No. 01-6314·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Scott v. South Carolina, No. CA-99-3932-313BBC (D.S.C. Feb. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Scott v. South Carolina, No. CA-99-3932-313BBC (D.S.C. Feb. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Scott v. South Carolina, 11 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

11 F. App'x 165 (Scott v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related