Scott v. Silberberg
This text of 251 A.D. 27 (Scott v. Silberberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court order appointing the receiver provided that he “ shall not incur obligations in- excess of the moneys in his hands without the further order of this Court.” Accordingly, plaintiff may not now be called upon to reimburse the receiver for advances made or obligations incurred by the latter, when there are insufficient funds in the receiver’s hands at the termination of the receivership to meet those charges.
The order, in so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion that plaintiff be directed to pay the deficit of $332.83 incurred by the receiver denied.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 27, 295 N.Y.S. 190, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-silberberg-nyappdiv-1937.