Scott v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Scott v. Sheriff

511 P.2d 117, 89 Nev. 285

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedJune 29, 1973

DocketNo. 7358

StatusPublished

This text of 511 P.2d 117 (Scott v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Sheriff, 511 P.2d 117, 89 Nev. 285 (Neb. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Charged with several crimes, appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to grant him habeas relief. The record designated and submitted to us does not contain the transcript of the challenged grand jury proceedings; therefore, we are “wholly unable to decide the issues presented.” Lamoureux v. Sheriff, 85 Nev. 44, 449 P.2d 471 (1969). Other claimed errors are not properly before this court and will not be considered. NRS 34.380(3); NRS 177.205(1). The order of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Charged with several crimes, appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to grant him habeas relief. The record designated and submitted to us does not contain the transcript of the challenged grand jury proceedings; therefore, we are “wholly unable to decide the issues presented.” Lamoureux v. Sheriff, 85 Nev. 44, 449 P.2d 471 (1969). Other claimed errors are not properly before this court and will not be considered. NRS 34.380(3); NRS 177.205(1). The order of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 P.2d 117, 89 Nev. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-sheriff-nev-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack