Scott v. Shaw

13 Johns. 378
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1816
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 13 Johns. 378 (Scott v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Shaw, 13 Johns. 378 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).

Opinion

Spencer, J.,

delivered ..the opinion of the.,courts

" The act, prohibiting the issuing .a ca¿ sa.' (1. N. R. L. 502.) upon 'judgments-rendered, .in- actions wherein'special bail has been filed,: until after’a fi. fa. does not render-a ca. sa. issued , before a fi. fa. void; it is only voidable at the. instance of the - party against whom it is thus issued.- The sheriff certainly in.- !. curred the- risk of liability for an escape on the first ca. sa., for he could not set up, in an action-against him- for an escape, that the ca¿ sa. .had issued!¡regularly the sheriff therefore, gained . -a- perfecttitle to. his-poundage, unaffected by the subsequent discharge of the prisoner." It is ’ no answer to, the' sheriff’s claim [379]*379for poundage, that he has received poundage upon another judgment between the same parties, and for the same original debt; it is, legally speaking, a new debt, as far as the sheriff is concerned. The allowance of poundage is for the risk incurred, and that risk is in proportion to the amount of the sum to he levied, and as the sheriff was exposed to. two risks, ho is entitled to the poundage on both executions»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray v. McDevitt
85 N.W. 1086 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
Amato v. Jacobus
58 F. 855 (Second Circuit, 1893)
Baker v. State ex rel. Mills
9 N.E. 711 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1887)
Flack v. . the State of New York
95 N.Y. 461 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Peck v. City National Bank of Grand Rapids
16 N.W. 681 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1883)
United States v. Haas
5 F. 29 (S.D. New York, 1880)
Merrimack County v. Town of Jaffrey
58 N.H. 426 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1878)
Ginochio v. Orser
1 Abb. Pr. 433 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1855)
Williams v. Hogeboom
8 Paige Ch. 469 (New York Court of Chancery, 1840)
Townsend v. United States
24 F. Cas. 103 (S.D. New York, 1822)
Hutchins v. Edson
1 N.H. 139 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1817)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-shaw-nysupct-1816.