Scott v. . Seneca River Power Company
118 N.E. 1077, 222 N.Y. 550, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 871
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Pound, M cLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Not sitting: Hogan, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. . Seneca River Power Company, 118 N.E. 1077, 222 N.Y. 550, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 871 (N.Y. 1917).
118 N.E. 1077 (Scott v. . Seneca River Power Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.