Scott v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided May 6, 2021·No. 18-1246·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Cunited States Court of Federal Claing

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: April 13, 2021

* * * * * * * * * * * * * STEPHANIE SCOTT, * Unpublished * Petitioner, * No. 18-1246V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation for Award; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Shoulder Injury Related to * Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). Respondent. * Influenza (“flu”). * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Leah V. Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Wei K. Tai, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

DECISION ON STIPULATION!

On August 20, 2018, Stephanie Scott (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.” Petition (ECF No. 1). Petitioner received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), on September 21, 2017. Petition at Preamble. Petitioner alleges that she subsequently suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (““SIRVA”) in her right shoulder, which petitioner alleges were caused-in-fact by her receipt of the flu vaccine, with residual effects of her injuries lasting for more than six months. Jd. at J 4.

On April 13, 2021, respondent filed a stipulation providing that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 42). Respondent denies that the flu immunization caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury

! Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The Court’s website is at http://Awww.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the opinion is posted on the Court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). An objecting party must provide the Court with a proposed redacted version of the opinion. /d. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the Court’s website without any changes. /d.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (2012) (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereinafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. and/or any other injury. /d. at { 6. While maintaining their respective positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of the stipulation, which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Jd. at {7.

The stipulation awards a lump sum of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) for injuries related to petitioner’s receipt of the flu vaccine.

I adopt the stipulation as the decision of the Court and hereby award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.*

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a). THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

STEPHANIE SCOTT,

Petitioner,

v. No. 18-1246V Special Master Gowen SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Stephanie Scott (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on or about September 21, 2017, in her right deltoid.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a right-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) within the time period set forth in the Table, or in the alternative, that her alleged shoulder injury was caused by the vaccine. She further alleges that she experienced residual effects of this alleged injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a Table SIRVA within the timeframe set forth in the Table; denies that her alleged SIRVA resulted in residual effects for more than six months; and denies that the flu immunization caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury and/or any other injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $80,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount

represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-15(a) for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the flu vaccine.

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Scott v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Scott v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a