Scott v. Scott
This text of 61 N.W. 286 (Scott v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are constrained to bold that tbe findings of tbe court are sustained by tbe evidence. This is on tbe assumption that tbe evidence printed in tbe case is a part of tbe record. From tbe facts stated, it is manifest that tbe plaintiff abandoned tbe premises as a statutory homestead. There does not appear to be any substantial ground for setting aside tbe deed from tbe plaintiff to tbe defendant, nor tbe contract between her and tbe plaintiff. Tbe plaintiff’s rights respecting tbe premises are specifically stipulated in tbe agreement. Both parties are bound by7 and should faithfully perform, that agreement.
By the Court.— Tbe judgment of tbe circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 N.W. 286, 89 Wis. 93, 1894 Wisc. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-scott-wis-1894.