Scott v. Scott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Scott v. Scott

1923 OK 63, 212 P. 420, 88 Okla. 178, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 581

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 30, 1923

Docket10775

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 63 (Scott v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Scott, 1923 OK 63, 212 P. 420, 88 Okla. 178, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 581 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Osage county; Honorable Charles B. Wilson, Jr., Judge.

The record discloses that Walter Scott, an incompetent, by his legal guardian and next friend, H. N. Oook, plaintiff in error, has perfected an appeal in this court from a judgment rendered by the trial court, and that on January 16, 1922, this court ordered that the plaintiff in error pay into this court the sum of $50 per month from the first day of March, 1922, and the sum of $200 attorney fee for the benefit of the defendant in error and her counsel, the latter sum to be paid within 60 days from said date. And thereafter, on August 9, 1922, a sufficient showing haying been made that said sums had not been paid as per the order of this court, this court caused a citation for contempt to be issued against the plaintiff in error, to which a response and reply have been filed.

It appearing to the court that said sums have not been paid as per order of this court, and no sufficient showing appearing why such payments have not been paid, it is the opinion of this court that the plaintiff In error’s appeal herein should be dismissed at his cost. And it is so ordered.

KANE, McNEILL, NICHOLSON, KENNA-MER, COCHRAN, BRANSON, and HARRISON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHNSON, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Osage county; Honorable Charles B. Wilson, Jr., Judge.

The record discloses that Walter Scott, an incompetent, by his legal guardian and next friend, H. N. Oook, plaintiff in error, has perfected an appeal in this court from a judgment rendered by the trial court, and that on January 16, 1922, this court ordered that the plaintiff in error pay into this court the sum of $50 per month from the first day of March, 1922, and the sum of $200 attorney fee for the benefit of the defendant in error and her counsel, the latter sum to be paid within 60 days from said date. And thereafter, on August 9, 1922, a sufficient showing haying been made that said sums had not been paid as per the order of this court, this court caused a citation for contempt to be issued against the plaintiff in error, to which a response and reply have been filed.

It appearing to the court that said sums have not been paid as per order of this court, and no sufficient showing appearing why such payments have not been paid, it is the opinion of this court that the plaintiff In error’s appeal herein should be dismissed at his cost. And it is so ordered.

KANE, McNEILL, NICHOLSON, KENNA-MER, COCHRAN, BRANSON, and HARRISON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK 63, 212 P. 420, 88 Okla. 178, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-scott-okla-1923.