Scott v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Scott v. Scott

89 S.E.2d 417, 242 N.C. 733, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 672

DecidedOctober 12, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 417 (Scott v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Scott, 89 S.E.2d 417, 242 N.C. 733, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 672 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The jury, on conflicting evidence, resolved the contested (second) issue in defendant’s favor; and there was ample evi[734]*734dence to support this verdict. After careful consideration of plaintiff’s assignments of error, we find no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

WiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The jury, on conflicting evidence, resolved the contested (second) issue in defendant’s favor; and there was ample evi[734]*734dence to support this verdict. After careful consideration of plaintiff’s assignments of error, we find no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

WiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E.2d 417, 242 N.C. 733, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-scott-nc-1955.