Scott v. Sargeant, S-09-014 (5-14-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Scott v. Sargeant, S-09-014 (5-14-2009)

2009 Ohio 2291

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 14, 2009

DocketNo. S-09-014.

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 2291 (Scott v. Sargeant, S-09-014 (5-14-2009)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Sargeant, S-09-014 (5-14-2009), 2009 Ohio 2291 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION AND JUDGMENT {¶ 1} This matter is before the court on a second complaint for a writ of mandamus filed by relator, Mychal Scott, on April 1, 2009. In his complaint, relator asks this court to compel respondent, Judge Harry Sargeant, to rule on a postconviction motion filed in case number 06 CR 832, on May 5, 2008. *Page 2

{¶ 2} For the reasons stated in our decision and judgment in case No. S-09-008, we find that relator's complaint in mandamus is defective. Accordingly, the application for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. SeeScott v. Sargeant, 6th Dist. No. S-09-008, 2009-Ohio-1745. Costs are assessed against relator. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal pursuant to Civ. R. 5(B).

{¶ 3} It is so ordered.

WRIT DENIED.

Peter M. Handwork, J., Arlene Singer, J., Thomas J. Osowik, J. concur. *Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI