Scott v. Ross

151 F.3d 1247, 98 Daily Journal DAR 9171, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6619, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20804, 1998 WL 537944
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 26, 1998·No. No. 96-35050·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Order; Concurrencé by Judge SCHROEDER; Dissent'by Judge KOZINSKI.

ORDER

The majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Schwarzer votes to grant the petition. Judge Schroeder votes to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judge Beezer so recommends.

[1248] The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration.

Pursuant to Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en bane is REJECTED.

Appellee’s motion to vacate this court’s October 27, 1997 Order staying execution of judgment is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Ross, 151 F.3d 1247, 98 Daily Journal DAR 9171, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6619, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 20804, 1998 WL 537944 (9th Cir. 1998).

151 F.3d 1247 (Scott v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related