Scott v. Rosenwitz
This text of 12 A.D.2d 529 (Scott v. Rosenwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 29, 1959, denying their motion to open their default and to vacate the dismissal of their complaint. The complaint had been dismissed pursuant to rule 302 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.D.2d 529, 210 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-rosenwitz-nyappdiv-1960.