Scott v. Rochdale Village, Inc.
This text of 249 A.D.2d 378 (Scott v. Rochdale Village, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Rochdale Village, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), entered March 13, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $85,400.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the court did not err, under the facts of this case, in instructing the jury with respect to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (see, Dermatossian v. New York City Tr. Auth., 67 NY2d 219; Myron v Millar El. Indus., 182 AD2d 558; Liebman v Otis El. Co., 127 AD2d 745).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D.2d 378, 670 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-rochdale-village-inc-nyappdiv-1998.