Scott v. Rayson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Scott v. Rayson

137 So. 748, 18 La. App. 26, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 628

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 18, 1931

DocketNo. 3919

StatusPublished

This text of 137 So. 748 (Scott v. Rayson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Rayson, 137 So. 748, 18 La. App. 26, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 628 (La. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

McGREGOR, J.

In this case, the plaintiff sues the defendant for $900 damages growing out of an automobile collision on the Greenwood road in Caddo parish. The lower court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $100, and the defendant has appealed. The defendant has made no appearance in this court to prosecute his appeal, while the plaintiff has appeared, asking that the judgment be sustained. Under these circumstances, and in view of the fact that a careful review of the evidence discloses no error on the part of the trial judge, the judgment must be affirmed.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the lower court [749]*749be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; the defendant and appellant to pay all costs of both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGREGOR, J.

In this case, the plaintiff sues the defendant for $900 damages growing out of an automobile collision on the Greenwood road in Caddo parish. The lower court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $100, and the defendant has appealed. The defendant has made no appearance in this court to prosecute his appeal, while the plaintiff has appeared, asking that the judgment be sustained. Under these circumstances, and in view of the fact that a careful review of the evidence discloses no error on the part of the trial judge, the judgment must be affirmed.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the lower court [749]*749be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; the defendant and appellant to pay all costs of both courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 So. 748, 18 La. App. 26, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-rayson-lactapp-1931.