Scott v. Prack

97 A.D.3d 861, 947 N.Y.2d 347
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 2012·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Torres v Bezio, 92 AD3d 1053 [2012]; Matter of Calix v Brown, 92 AD3d 1001 [2012]).

Mercure, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Prack, 97 A.D.3d 861, 947 N.Y.2d 347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

97 A.D.3d 861 (Scott v. Prack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Harrison v. Annucci
2017 NY Slip Op 6575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Moore v. Annucci
148 A.D.3d 1445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Murgo v. Racette
100 A.D.3d 1244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Walker v. Fischer
100 A.D.3d 1174 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)