Scott v. Padula

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7022

JAMES D. SCOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY PADULA, Lee CI Warden; LINDA DUNLAP, SCDC Medical Nurse Director; GENE NOLES, SCDC Inmate Grievance Director; JON OZMINT, SCDC Director; DOCTOR DAVIS, SCDC Medical Director; C. JAMES; GERALDINE P. MIRO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (0:08-cv-03240-HFF)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 17, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James D. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James D. Scott appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Scott v. Padula, No. 0:08-cv-03240-HFF (D.S.C. filed June 30,

2010; entered July 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Pursuant to 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we have limited our review to the issues raised in Scott’s informal brief.