Scott v. P. C. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scott v. P. C. Corp.

2 A.D.2d 676, 152 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 676 (Scott v. P. C. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. P. C. Corp., 2 A.D.2d 676, 152 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified so as to reduce the attachment to the sum of $20,000 and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. The material allegations of the second cause of action are wholly conclusory and fail to state sufficient facts to constitute an identifiable cause of action. The affidavit in support of the attachment supplies no information to clarify the allegations of that cause of action. The maximum amount that might be levied on under the remaining causes of action is $20,000. Therefore the warrant of attachment and the amount of the attachment should be limited to that sum. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Frank and Valente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified so as to reduce the attachment to the sum of $20,000 and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. The material allegations of the second cause of action are wholly conclusory and fail to state sufficient facts to constitute an identifiable cause of action. The affidavit in support of the attachment supplies no information to clarify the allegations of that cause of action. The maximum amount that might be levied on under the remaining causes of action is $20,000. Therefore the warrant of attachment and the amount of the attachment should be limited to that sum. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Frank and Valente, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 676, 152 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-p-c-corp-nyappdiv-1956.