Scott v. Norfolk Southern Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Scott v. Norfolk Southern Corp.

667 F. App'x 411

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 27, 2016·No. No. 16-1227, No. 16-1228·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding, precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We grant Scott’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. Scott v. Norfolk S. Corp., No. 2:95-cv-00377-RBS; 2:95-cv-00815-RBS (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2016; Feb. 22, 2016). We deny the Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are.adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding, precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We grant Scott’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. Scott v. Norfolk S. Corp., No. 2:95-cv-00377-RBS; 2:95-cv-00815-RBS (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2016; Feb. 22, 2016). We deny the Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are.adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Scott v. Norfolk Southern Corp., 667 F. App'x 411 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 411 (Scott v. Norfolk Southern Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.