Scott v. New York Dugan Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scott v. New York Dugan Bros.

271 A.D.2d 1015

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 1015 (Scott v. New York Dugan Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. New York Dugan Bros., 271 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by the infant plaintiff, through her guardian ad litem,, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by her when run over by the corporate defendant’s truck, and by her father for expenses and loss of services. Order denying defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, but reducing the verdict for the infant plaintiff from $30,000 to $15,000, upon stipulation of the infant plaintiff’s guardian ad litem, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The jury was justified in finding negligence on the part of the driver of the corporate defendant’s truck in backing the truck without due regard for the safety of children playing in the street, and [1016]*1016thus running over the infant plaintiff. Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by the infant plaintiff, through her guardian ad litem,, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by her when run over by the corporate defendant’s truck, and by her father for expenses and loss of services. Order denying defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, but reducing the verdict for the infant plaintiff from $30,000 to $15,000, upon stipulation of the infant plaintiff’s guardian ad litem, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The jury was justified in finding negligence on the part of the driver of the corporate defendant’s truck in backing the truck without due regard for the safety of children playing in the street, and [1016]*1016thus running over the infant plaintiff. Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-new-york-dugan-bros-nyappdiv-1947.