Scott v. Naughton
Opinion
3 kee 4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, Ill, Case No. 3:23-CV-00257-MMD-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 8 DR. NAUGHTON, ef a/., Defendants. 9 10 On May 23, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF 11 No. 27.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 13 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 30). To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. 14 Accordingly, the Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to Wednesday, July 23, 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary 16 judgment. No further extensions of time will be granted, absent extraordinary 17 circumstances. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the 18 Court for decision. 20 DATED: June 23, 2025. c ‘ 21 22 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. Naughton (Scott v. Naughton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.