Scott v. Morris National Bank
271 U.S. 646, 46 S. Ct. 487
This text of 271 U.S. 646 (Scott v. Morris National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scott v. Morris National Bank, 271 U.S. 646, 46 S. Ct. 487 (1926).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Company v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Missouri v. Andriano, 138 U. S. 496; Rae v. Homestead Loan & Guaranty Company, 176 U. S. 121; Baker v. Baldwin, 187 U. S. 61.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Missouri v. Andriano
138 U.S. 496 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Rae v. Homestead Loan & Guaranty Co.
176 U.S. 121 (Supreme Court, 1900)
Baker v. Baldwin
187 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
271 U.S. 646, 46 S. Ct. 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-morris-national-bank-scotus-1926.