Scott v. Morris National Bank
271 U.S. 646, 46 S. Ct. 487
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Company v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Missouri v. Andriano, 138 U. S. 496; Rae v. Homestead Loan & Guaranty Company, 176 U. S. 121; Baker v. Baldwin, 187 U. S. 61.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. Morris National Bank, 271 U.S. 646, 46 S. Ct. 487 (1926).
271 U.S. 646 (Scott v. Morris National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Missouri v. Andriano
138 U.S. 496 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Rae v. Homestead Loan & Guaranty Co.
176 U.S. 121 (Supreme Court, 1900)
Baker v. Baldwin
187 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)