Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Scott v. Morris

Scott v. Morris

619 So. 2d 1049, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6511, 1993 WL 210579
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2287
StatusPublished

This text of 619 So. 2d 1049 (Scott v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Morris, 619 So. 2d 1049, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6511, 1993 WL 210579 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s malpractice action was properly dismissed with prejudice, as it appears from the face of the complaint that [1050]*1050the action was filed beyond the limitations period in section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes, and the record does not otherwise suggest the existence of any disputed factual issue in this regard. See Roehner v. Atlantic Coast Development Corp., 356 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

ZEHMER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roehner v. ATLANTIC COAST DEV. CORP.
356 So. 2d 1296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 So. 2d 1049, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6511, 1993 WL 210579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-morris-fladistctapp-1993.