Scott v. Morgan

Fourth Circuit

Scott v. Morgan

573 F. App'x 282

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2014·No. No. 14-6231·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Scott, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) action against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Scott v. Morgan, No. 1:13—cv-01098-RDB (D. Md. filed Jan. 18, 2014; entered Jan. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Scott, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) action against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Scott v. Morgan, No. 1:13—cv-01098-RDB (D. Md. filed Jan. 18, 2014; entered Jan. 14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Scott v. Morgan, 573 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

573 F. App'x 282 (Scott v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related