Scott v. Morgan
This text of 20 F. App'x 196 (Scott v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael A. Scott appeals the district court judgment granting Judge Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.’s motion to dismiss for failing to state a claim and dismissing the complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scott v. Morgan, CA-00-895-2 (E.D.Va. May 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 F. App'x 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-morgan-ca4-2001.