Scott v. Morgan

20 F. App'x 196
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 11, 2001·No. 01-1933·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*197 PER CURIAM.

Michael A. Scott appeals the district court judgment granting Judge Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.’s motion to dismiss for failing to state a claim and dismissing the complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scott v. Morgan, CA-00-895-2 (E.D.Va. May 25, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Morgan, 20 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2001).

20 F. App'x 196 (Scott v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related