Scott v. M&M Luxury Automotive, LLC
This text of Scott v. M&M Luxury Automotive, LLC (Scott v. M&M Luxury Automotive, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
LATANYA SCOTT,
Plaintiff, Case No. 23-cv-12564 v. Honorable Linda V. Parker
M&M LUXURY AUTOMOTIVE, LLC,
Defendant. ___________________________________/
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 4]
On October 11, 2023, Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit against Defendant asserting sex discrimination/harassment (Count I) and retaliation (Count II) in violation of federal and Michigan law. (ECF No. 1.) On November 3, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s sex discrimination/harassment claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing that Plaintiff failed to plead sufficient facts to support the claim. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint in response on November 21. (ECF No. 7.) As a result of the amendment, the Complaint to which the motion to dismiss is directed has been superseded and the motion is moot. See Glass v. The Kellogg Co., 252 F.R.D. 367, 368 (W.D. Mich. 2008) (citing cases). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 4) is DENIED AS MOOT.
s/ Linda V. Parker LINDA V. PARKER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 22, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott v. M&M Luxury Automotive, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-mm-luxury-automotive-llc-mied-2023.