Scott v. Michell

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided February 14, 2025·No. 3:23-cv-00231·Unknown

Opinion

3 kee 4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III, Case No. 3:23-CV-00231-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MELISSA MICHELL, et a/., ° Defendants. 9 10 On January 21, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Ejikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9" Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9" Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 42). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to March 14, 2025, 15 to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time 16 shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the 17 court for decision. 19 DATED. February 14, 2025 20 .

21 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Michell, (D. Nev. 2025).

Scott v. Michell (Scott v. Michell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related