Scott v. McCullough

72 Ohio St. (N.S.) 538
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 27, 1905
DocketNo. 9527
StatusPublished

This text of 72 Ohio St. (N.S.) 538 (Scott v. McCullough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. McCullough, 72 Ohio St. (N.S.) 538 (Ohio 1905).

Opinion

Summers, J.

The question to be determined is whether territory already comprised in a special school district may be included in another special school district.

The civil township is the basis of our school system. Land in each township was donated by the national government to the inhabitants of such township for the use of schools. For surveying the Northwest Territory congress adopted a new system of surveying. This system may be briefly described as the rectangular system. The territory was surveyed into townships six miles square. Each township was divided into thirty-six sections one mile square, and, under the system of numbering, section sixteen was as nearly as any other in the center of the township.

By section 7 of the act of 1802, which authorized the people of the eastern division of the Northwest Territory to form a constitution and a state government, congress proposed that section 16 in every township “shall be granted to the inhabitants of such township for the use of schools. ’ ’ The proposition was accepted by a resolution passed November 29, 1802, by the constitutional convention, on condition that a like donation, amounting to about one [540]*540thirty-sixth of the territory, be made in those parts of the state not surveyed, and this condition was complied with by an act of congress in 1803. And in that year the legislature provided for the leasing of the same in order that the proceeds arising therefrom might be applied to the support of the schools. By an act passed in 1806 the commissioners, as soon as there were twenty electors in any original surveyed township, or part or fractional township, upon application of the electors, were required to fix the time and place for the election of trustees, who were empowered to lay off the township into proper divisions for the purpose of establishing schools therein. These districts were subdistricts. Subsequently joint subdistricts and city and village districts were provided for, and our system of common schools comprised township schools and city or village schools. The township was or might be divided into districts, and the city or village district might include territory outside of the corporate limits of the city or village. Whether or not this donation by the national government originated or made necessary á system in which the civil township is the basis, it is not necessary to determine. The civil township and the original surveyed township are not always identical. The important thing is the fact that only territory forming part of the township school district was taken in creating other districts.

Special districts were established by vote of the people under legislative authority or by special legislation, and were governed by the provisions of the act under which they were created. But prior to the act of 1873 (70 O. L., 195), special school districts were not recognized as a part of the common school system. By that act they were included as a part [541]*541of that system, hut it was not until the revision of the statutes in 1880 that provision was made for the establishment of such schools. Then section 3891 provided that: “Such districts may be established as provided in chapter five of this title.” Chapter five provided for the establishment of joint sub-districts, and that a joint subdistrict composed of parts of two or more townships might be established by the mutual agreement of the boards of education of the townships interested. Also that they might be so formed on petition of three or more qualified electors residents of the territory sought to be included therein, and that in the event such boards failed to do so within sixty days, three or more of such electors might file a petition therefor with the probate judge of the county, and it is made his duty to appoint three judicious, disinterested men of the county, not residents of either of the townships to be affected, to be commissioners, who were to meet at a time and place fixed by the probate judge, notice of which was to be given as therein provided, and there hear witnesses and consider and determine the question whether a joint subdistrict ought to be established. And if they reported in favor of the establishment of a joint subdistrict, it was the duty of the judge to make an entry confirming the same. It is apparent that it was the intention of the legislature that only territory in township districts not already forming a part of a city or village or special school district should be taken to form a joint sub-district. Territory included in a city or village or special school district was regarded as already preempted and not subject to be taken. And so far as we are advised it never occurred to any one that any part of such territory was subject to be taken, and [542]*542when the legislature provided in section 3946 that a petition might in like manner be filed praying for the creation of a special school district, it contemplated its creation from like territory. And in section 3928 of the Revised Statutes, as enacted in the so-called Harrison school code (97 O. L., 334, 345) the same thing was contemplated. It is as follows:

“A special school district may be formed of any contiguous territory, not included within the limits of an incorporated city or village, which has a total tax valuation of not less than one hundred thousand dollars. To establish a special school district, a petition signed by not less than ten male citizens who are electors of the proposed special district shall be filed in the office of the probate judge of the county in which such special district is situated, or if said district is situated in two or more counties, then with the probate judge of the county having the greatest total tax valuation in said proposed district; said petition shall set forth the' desires of the petitioners, shall contain a description of the territory to be included in the proposed special district, and shall be accompanied by a statement giving the total tax valuation of said territory certified to by the county auditor or auditors and also an accurate map of the territory to be included in said district, the same to be prepared to the satisfaction of the probate judge; said petition shall also be accompanied by an undertaking of one or more of the petitioners, with security to the satisfaction of the judge, in the sum of one hundred dollars, conditioned that the parties entering into the undertaking shall pay all the costs of the proceedings if a special school district is not created, and in sueb case the probate judge shall render judgment against "the [543]*543parties to the undertaking for all the costs of the proceedings. In case the petition is granted the costs shall be taxed against the special school district thereby authorized and shall be paid by the board of education of said special school district, thereafter elected, from any funds that may come into its possession. A remonstrance signed by one or more of the male citizens who are electors of the proposed district may be filed with the probate judge and shall be considered on the hearing of the petition.”

The section then provides that nothing therein contained shall be construed to abolish any special school district then in existence. Section 3929 of the Revised Statutes, as enacted in said code, is as follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 Ohio St. (N.S.) 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-mccullough-ohio-1905.