Scott v. . McClung
112 N.E. 1076, 217 N.Y. 701, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1480
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that according to the findings unanimously affirmed there was a change of grade; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury-, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. . McClung, 112 N.E. 1076, 217 N.Y. 701, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1480 (N.Y. 1916).
112 N.E. 1076 (Scott v. . McClung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.