Scott v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Scott v. Mayo

32 So. 2d 821, 159 Fla. 816, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 967

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 9, 1947

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 32 So. 2d 821 (Scott v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Mayo, 32 So. 2d 821, 159 Fla. 816, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 967 (Fla. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

BUFORD, J.:

On petition for writ of habeas corpus we issued writ and return has come in.

The record now shows that petitioner on August 3rd 1942 was informed against as having been four times convicted of offenses constituting felonies. It is shown that convictions of two of the felonies occurred on the same day, viz: October 28th 1931. Therefore, one only of these two convictions could be counted in arriving at the number of convictions which had been had of the petitioner. See Joyner v. State,......Fla......., 30 So. (2nd) 304. So the petitioner at the time of the conviction under which he is now serving was not amenable to the charge of having been four times theretofore convicted of felonies. However, the record does show that he had twice theretofore been convicted of felonies and was amenable to punishment within the purview of Sec. 775.09 Fla. Statutes 1941, (same F.S.A.).

*817 Therefore, we do not discharge the petitioner but, under the provisions of Sec. 924.34 Fla. Statutes 1941 (same F.S.A.), remand him to the custody of respondent with directions that petitioner be presented to the Criminal Court of Record of Polk County Florida, for judgment and sentence as is provided in Sec. 775.09, Supra, which said offense is included within the offense charged in the information under whitíh petitioner was convicted.

Remanded with directions.

So ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFORD, J.:

On petition for writ of habeas corpus we issued writ and return has come in.

The record now shows that petitioner on August 3rd 1942 was informed against as having been four times convicted of offenses constituting felonies. It is shown that convictions of two of the felonies occurred on the same day, viz: October 28th 1931. Therefore, one only of these two convictions could be counted in arriving at the number of convictions which had been had of the petitioner. See Joyner v. State,......Fla......., 30 So. (2nd) 304. So the petitioner at the time of the conviction under which he is now serving was not amenable to the charge of having been four times theretofore convicted of felonies. However, the record does show that he had twice theretofore been convicted of felonies and was amenable to punishment within the purview of Sec. 775.09 Fla. Statutes 1941, (same F.S.A.).

*817 Therefore, we do not discharge the petitioner but, under the provisions of Sec. 924.34 Fla. Statutes 1941 (same F.S.A.), remand him to the custody of respondent with directions that petitioner be presented to the Criminal Court of Record of Polk County Florida, for judgment and sentence as is provided in Sec. 775.09, Supra, which said offense is included within the offense charged in the information under whitíh petitioner was convicted.

Remanded with directions.

So ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 So. 2d 821, 159 Fla. 816, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-mayo-fla-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack