Scott v. Marshall

1933 OK 33, 18 P.2d 529, 161 Okla. 283, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 454
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 24, 1933
Docket22446
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1933 OK 33 (Scott v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Marshall, 1933 OK 33, 18 P.2d 529, 161 Okla. 283, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 454 (Okla. 1933).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

March 29; 1930'. Charles F. Marshall filed petition for recovery on replevin bond, and on November 20, 1930, judgment was rendered on a verdict for plaintiff for $900. June 11, 1931, defendants named appealed to- this' court, and on April 19; 1932, filed their brief, but the defendant in error has failed to file brief or to ’excuse such failure. Examination of the authorities cited reasonably tends to support the assignments of error, and this being’ true, this court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which to sustain the judgment of the trial court. City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233, 253 P. 481. The case is reversed and remanded, with (directions to vacate the judgment of plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant.

Note. — See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 176; R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 360.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1933 OK 33, 18 P.2d 529, 161 Okla. 283, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-marshall-okla-1933.