Scott v. Lender Processing Services, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Scott v. Lender Processing Services, Inc.

478 F. App'x 775

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2012·No. No. 12-1586·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellants’ motion to dismiss and for summary judgment and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Lender Processing Servs., Inc., No. 2:11— cv-00298-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. April 2, 2012). We grant Scott’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellants’ motion to dismiss and for summary judgment and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Lender Processing Servs., Inc., No. 2:11— cv-00298-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. April 2, 2012). We grant Scott’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Scott v. Lender Processing Services, Inc., 478 F. App'x 775 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

478 F. App'x 775 (Scott v. Lender Processing Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.