Scott v. Lee
This text of Scott v. Lee (Scott v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6997
AUBREY D. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DR. JAMES LEE, M.D.; DR. GERALO JORDON, Surgeon; DR. LEONARD J. WEIRETER, Surgeon,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 02-7004
DR. JAMES LEE, M.D.; DR. GERALO JORDON, Surgeon; DR. LEONARD J. WEIRETER, Surgeon,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-757-3) Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 17, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aubrey D. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Aubrey D. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Scott v. Lee, No. CA-01-757-3 (E.D. Va. May 30, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-lee-ca4-2002.