Scott v. Lazell

S.D. New York

Scott v. Lazell

177 F. 608, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5337

DecidedJanuary 28, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 177 F. 608 (Scott v. Lazell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Lazell, 177 F. 608, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5337 (S.D.N.Y. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

The exceptions filed by complainant to the answer interposed to the supplementary bill are allowed. The objectionable matter in paragraphs 8, 9, and 10 of the answer must be expunged. Defendants apparently have had their day in court (Scott v. Dazell, 160 Fed. 472, 87 C. C. A. 456) on the various defenses to which exceptions are filed.

As to whether the defendant Marks and the corporation were privies to the former judgment are questions of fact, which are not now before the court for decision.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAZEL, District Judge.

The exceptions filed by complainant to the answer interposed to the supplementary bill are allowed. The objectionable matter in paragraphs 8, 9, and 10 of the answer must be expunged. Defendants apparently have had their day in court (Scott v. Dazell, 160 Fed. 472, 87 C. C. A. 456) on the various defenses to which exceptions are filed.

As to whether the defendant Marks and the corporation were privies to the former judgment are questions of fact, which are not now before the court for decision.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 F. 608, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-lazell-nysd-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack