Scott v. Lazell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Scott v. Lazell

169 F. 661, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5464

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 21, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

One of the elements of the claim in question is the series of slits in the lower portion of the bustle connected together at their edges. The defendants’ device does not have this series of slits. Whether the defendants’ method of gathering in the material is an equivalent for them is a question too doub'tful to be determined upon a motion for a preliminary injunction.

The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

One of the elements of the claim in question is the series of slits in the lower portion of the bustle connected together at their edges. The defendants’ device does not have this series of slits. Whether the defendants’ method of gathering in the material is an equivalent for them is a question too doub'tful to be determined upon a motion for a preliminary injunction.

The motion is denied.

Scott v. Lazell, 169 F. 661, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5464 (circtsdny 1909).

Pincite

169 F. 661 (Scott v. Lazell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related