Scott v. Laux

457 S.W.3d 380, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 246, 2015 WL 1094082
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 10, 2015·No. No. ED 101705·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Joe Scott (Plaintiff) appeals the Circuit Court of St. Louis County’s order and final judgment dismissing, with prejudice, his claims against AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (Defendant). On appeal, Plaintiff asserts that the circuit court erred by granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because: (1) Plaintiff pleaded that § 376.590(2) establishes a principal-agent relationship between Defendant and the brokers and (2) Plaintiff pleaded adequate facts to support his claims for .declaratory judgment and money had and received. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Laux, 457 S.W.3d 380, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 246, 2015 WL 1094082 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

457 S.W.3d 380 (Scott v. Laux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.