Scott v. Lauman

104 Pa. 593, 1884 Pa. LEXIS 43
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 8, 1883·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was filed January 7th 1884.

Per Curiam.

— To constitute a valid gift, there must be a delivery of the property to the donee, or to some person for his use. A gift is a contract executed. The act of execution is the delivery of possession. Without delivery, it is only a contract to give, not binding for want of consideration: Campbell’s Estate, 7 Barr 100; Withers v. Weaver, 10 Id. 391; Kidder v. Kidder, 9 Casey 268; Trough’s Estate, 25 P. F. S. 115; Zimmerman v. Streeper, Id. 147.

In the.present case there was no delivery to the donee, nor to any person for his use. The donee placed in the hands of his own attorney the certificate of deposit, and the order to pay a part of the sum therein specified to the donee, ile did not instruct his attorney to deliver it to the donee. The latter had no knowledge of any act of the donor relating to the intended gift. Without delivery the whole evidence was insufficient to support the paper as an executed contract.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Lauman, 104 Pa. 593, 1884 Pa. LEXIS 43 (Pa. 1883).

104 Pa. 593 (Scott v. Lauman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Evans
356 A.2d 778 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Rynier Estate
32 A.2d 736 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Goldberg v. Wine
192 A. 252 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Stewart's Estate
163 A. 754 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Dulin v. Commissioner
25 B.T.A. 1259 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1932)
Allshouse's Estate
156 A. 69 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Hartman's Estate
12 Pa. D. & C. 197 (Lehigh County Orphans' Court, 1928)
Oldfield's Estate
72 Pa. Super. 340 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Isett v. Maclay
108 A. 610 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
O'Gorman v. Jolley
147 N.W. 78 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)
Appeal of Walsh
15 A. 470 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)