Scott v. Kosova Props. Inc.

2025 NY Slip Op 01070
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 25, 2025
DocketIndex No. 160924/19; Appeal No. 3771; Case No. 2024-06718
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 01070 (Scott v. Kosova Props. Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott v. Kosova Props. Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 01070 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Scott v Kosova Props. Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 01070)
Scott v Kosova Props. Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 01070
Decided on February 25, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: February 25, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Kapnick, Rodriguez, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

Index No. 160924/19|Appeal No. 3771|Case No. 2024-06718|

[*1]Gregory Scott, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Kosova Properties Inc. et al., Defendants-Respondents.


The Basil Law Group, P.C., New York (Robert J. Basil of counsel), for appellant.

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, New York (John P. Cookson of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered October 28, 2024, which granted defendants' motion for a protective order with respect to plaintiff's August 23, 2023 notice to take deposition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting defendants' motion under CPLR 3103 for a protective order limiting the scope of the depositions and precluding questions pertaining to the topics set forth in numbers 8, 10, 11, and 13 of the notice because either the information sought is subject to the attorney-client privilege, or the topic is not sufficiently tailored to seek information material and necessary to the prosecution or defense of this action (CPLR 3101[a]). The court's discretionary determination is entitled to deference (see Gumbs v Flushing Town Ctr. III, L.P. , 114

AD3d 573, 574 [1st Dept 2014]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: February 25, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 3101
New York CVP § 3101
§ 3103
New York CVP § 3103
§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 01070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-kosova-props-inc-nyappdiv-2025.