Scott v. Koester

Sixth Circuit

Scott v. Koester

119 F.2d 418, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3728

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 6, 1941

DocketNo. 8604

StatusPublished

This text of 119 F.2d 418 (Scott v. Koester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. Koester, 119 F.2d 418, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3728 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing to the court that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury, and that there was no reversible error in the charge or in the action of the court in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by appellant, or upon the record as a whole, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from, be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing to the court that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury, and that there was no reversible error in the charge or in the action of the court in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by appellant, or upon the record as a whole, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from, be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 F.2d 418, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-koester-ca6-1941.