Scott v. Kodama

Fourth Circuit

Scott v. Kodama

557 F. App'x 226

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2014·No. No. 13-7686·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Scott, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against Ken Koda-ma. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Scott v. Kodama, No. l:13-cv-02279-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Scott, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint against Ken Koda-ma. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Scott v. Kodama, No. l:13-cv-02279-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Scott v. Kodama, 557 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

557 F. App'x 226 (Scott v. Kodama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related