Scott v. Kelly
This text of 89 U.S. 57 (Scott v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The writ of error in this case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
The assignee in bankruptcy voluntarily submitted himself and his rights to the jurisdiction of the State court. Being summoned he appeared, without objection, and presented his claim for adjudication by that court. No effort was made to remove the litigation to the courts of the United States. It is now too late to object to the power of the State court to act in the premises and render judgment. ‡
The question presented for the decision of the State court was not whether, if the bankrupt had title, it would pass to his assignee by the operation of the Bankrupt Act, but whether he had title at all. The court decided that he had *60 not. Such a decision by a State court does not present a question of which this court can take jurisdiction upon a writ of error.
Writ dismissed.
Mays v. Fritton, 20 Wallace, 414.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 U.S. 57, 22 L. Ed. 729, 22 Wall. 57, 1874 U.S. LEXIS 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-kelly-scotus-1875.